This past Friday a judge in Boston ruled that parents "do not have the right to dictate curriculum in public schools." It seems a couple sets of parents got ticked off at the "gay-friendly" curriculum their children were being exposed to and filed a lawsuit. One child brought home a book depicting different kinds of families, including gay families; the other child listened to his second-grade teacher read the fairy tale "King & King."
To me, the most interesting quote in the article I read was this:
In his ruling, Wolf said parents have a fundamental right to raise their children and are not required to abandon that responsibility to the state. But he said the Parkers and the Wirthlins have alternatives if they do not approve of the curriculum at public schools, including private schools, home-schooling and working to elect a Lexington school committee that will choose a curriculum more compatible with their beliefs.
Maybe I'm over-reacting, but to me this sounds like 'you don't like it, take your kid elsewhere.' That's all well and good, but if a parent is forced to consider other educational options because of the blatant indoctrination their child is facing at public school, shouldn't we have some sort of voucher program in place? I mean, I get a little ticked when I see the taxes that I, a single person with no children, pay for public schooling...but I understand that it's a function of contributing to society. However, I can imagine I'd be even more hacked off if I had to pay for public schooling with my taxes and then foot the bill for private school as well.
At the heart of this discussion is the question of what public schools are responsible for as far as what material they teach children. The judge said:
''In essence under the Constitution public schools are entitled to teach anything that is reasonably related to the goals of preparing students to become engaged and productive citizens in our democracy."
I agree with that to an extent, but to be honest, if I had children I'd be a lot more interested in sending them to a school that put time and energy into making sure my child passed math and science standards. I'm sort of appalled that we have an epidemic of children failing basic standards all over this country and teachers complaining they don't have the resources to accomplish the job, but at the same time they're able to devote plenty of energy to tolerance and sex-ed curriculum.
The ACLU supported the school district <shocking!> and a spokesman said of the ruling:
''This is not a case about teaching about homosexuality. This is a case where Lexington sought to teach about diversity and about having respect...It's not about sexuality; they were teaching about different kinds of families.''
Setting aside for a moment whether you think tolerance, diversity and the like is appropriate grade school curriculum, do you agree that teaching about homosexual families and reading fairy tales where the prince spurns the princesses paraded before him to run off with another prince is as innocent as the ACLU says it is?