SB 777.
What I wrote last night about leaving LA too soon -- I take that back. According to worldnetdaily, today the California Senate passed SB 777 which redefines sex from it's current definition:
"Sex means the biological condition or quality of being a male or female human being."
...to a new, more tolerant gender-based definition:
"A person's gender identity and gender related appearance and behavior whether or not stereotypically associated with the person's assigned sex at birth."
In other words, if a boy feels like he's really a girl at heart, he should be allowed to use the girl's bathroom, go into the girl's locker room and be elected prom queen.
The bill also bans any references that are deemed derogatory to those in the LGBT lifestyle in textbooks, school handouts, posters, etc. What might be an example of a derogatory statement?
"References to a 'mother' and 'father' in any school text appear to be threatened because they could be interpreted as 'reflecting' a bias against the 'Partner 1' and 'Partner 2' of same-sex lifestyle."
Also derogatory would be a presentation in health class that broke down AIDS statistics into various categories, like infection rates among the homosexual population as compared to the heterosexual population that might lead one to believe there might be a different risk associated with each lifestyle.
The last quote I found interesting was a summary of a similar bill vetoed by the Govenator last year. It sounds oddly familiar...like maybe they took it from my novel. ;)
A second <bill> would have "integrated tolerance training" into history and social science curriculum and started a pilot program that would have forced students to learn a "new definition" of tolerance, one that would require them to not only accept but advocate for homosexuality, bisexuality and transgenderism.
