Although I do try to resist talking about the Presidential election <or even reading about it myself> so as not to become even sicker of the process than I already am...two recent articles made me snicker. Yesterday the Idaho Statesman had an article entitled "Just how unelectable is Hillary Clinton?" I've searched around and can't find the article online, but seriously, how negative is that headline? It made me laugh a little.

Kind of like the article I read awhile back that discussed why she was laughing more in appearances -- the article suggested it was her image-makers who'd told her she was too cold, so now instead of appearing cold she appears robotic: humorous anecdote coming, lean back head, open mouth and guffaw. How low have we sunk that we have to discuss whether a person is genuinely laughing instead of their political positions?

However, not quite so funny was an article I read this morning that quoted a number of terrorist leaders in Iraq and Palestine who went on record as stating they hoped Hillary won the election because it would further their goals for the region. What a terrible endorsement!

But there I go getting serious when I only wanted to have a little fun. There was one funny part to that last article -- one terrorist said if Hillary followed her husband's foreign policy and stood up to the evil Israelis, she might suffer a conspiracy like he did:

...White House intern Monica Lewinsky really was an Israeli Mossad implant sent to destroy President Clinton's career after he pressured the Jewish state to evacuate territory to the Palestinians.

and the piece de resistance: 

If Hillary goes too much against the Zionist interests, she will face the same conspiracy like her husband who fell into the trap of Lewinsky. I have no doubt [Lewinsky] was planted by the Zionists, who wanted to send a message to all future American presidents – do not go against the Israeli policy. Bill Clinton made the Oslo agreement and promoted peace but the Israelis did not give him a chance.