Main

April 21, 2008

Expelled.

Ben Stein's Expelled did better than expected this weekend, earning over $3 million dollars in limited release <check out how little Where is Osama made by comparison>. I can report that the screening I attended Sunday afternoon contained a packed house in one of the largest theaters in Boise. Quirky, I believe, would be a good adjective to describe the documentary. Definitely interesting, challenging and not just a bit courageous, but surely quirky.

Mr. Stein runs around the world talking to scientists on both sides of "the wall" he labors to convince us exists. Basically his premise is that mainstream science worldwide will not allow anyone to jump out of lockstep with Darwinism. He interviews a number of people "expelled" for something as small as mentioning Intelligent Design exists as an alternative theory in the classroom <a professor> or refusing to show bias in an article written about ID <a journalist>.

For such serious and possibly boring material as you might guess a bunch of interviews with scientists would be, the movie whips along at a fast clip and is quite entertaining. Mr. Stein's monologues are often interlaced with over-the-top black and white footage, such as a gang of boys pushing around another for not fitting in, or a teacher showing how her class can play the silent game. Like I said...quirky.

The most disturbing part of the documentary comes when we journey to Germany to delve into the connections between Darwinist theory and Nazi policies. I've never heard anything like it, but in my opinion at least, Mr. Stein made a very good case for the logical extension of the theory of Natural Selection.

Overall, Expelled is a documentary worth seeing. But don't take my word for it: our local paper gave it a half-star this weekend, along with a sarcastic, spite-filled rant masquerading as a review. Could they be just a little more obvious? As a friend who went with me said -- even the latest blood and guts filled teenage sex romp gets one star... ;)

November 07, 2007

Rusticating.

I've been on a Jane Austen-ish kick lately. It started with reading The Jane Austen Book Club <too much modern drama-homosexuality, affairs-not enough Jane>, then I switched to the new Pride & Prejudice sequels written by Elizabeth Aston.

  • Mr. Darcy's Daughters: I thought the main character a bit of a sap and was disappointed at the author's rendition of Elizabeth Bennett's five daughters turning out so terribly. Also disappointed that homosexuality had to play a role <does everything have to have an agenda?>. I'd give it a 3 out of 5 because it's mostly clean and a fluffy, entertaining read if you like Austen's style and time period.
  • The Exploits & Adventures of Ms. Alethea Darcy: probably my favorite of the three I've read, though it was not anything like a Jane Austen novel beyond the time period. A girl dresses as a boy to escape a terrible marriage and has many adventures. I admired her pluck in a time women were supposed to spend all their time stitching samplers. ;) 4 out of 5.
  • The True Darcy Spirit: well, one thing you can say about Aston is she probably didn't have to get her books past a clergyman father. Her girls are running off with men then not marrying them, engaging in pre-marital sex, running away from men pretending to want to marry them while secretly being homosexual, etc., etc. This was my least favorite of the three, considering I thought the heroine a big dope, and the romantic angle <b/c of course there's a romantic angle in these stories> highly contrived and shoved into the last five pages. 3 out of 5, again because there's no explicit sex, nor language, so I have to give it a rating on the upper side.

I thought I'd write about these books so you don't think I'm always reading about politics and terrorism and end times and the culture wars and etc., etc. ;)

My favorite thing I got out of the above four -- the term 'rusticating.' Meaning: to retire to your country estate and dither around gardening and reading books and riding horses and taking long walks. Derogatorily spoken of by the London socialites who spent their time whirling from ball to ball and intrigue to intrigue -- but highly attractive to one such as I. :p

August 22, 2007

Book TV: Freedomnomics.

Over the past year or two I've made no small amount of fun of my dad for calling me at all hours to tell me about the latest segment he's watched on his favorite program -- Book TV on C-SPAN. Sadly, this past weekend I got sucked into a program myself. I blame genetics.

I watched a talk given by John Lott, author of Freedomnomics, and the 40-minutes or so that I caught was fascinating. When I tuned in he was talking about writing and how it wouldn't be worth it for him to spend a year or two writing a book if he'd only be paid a little over the cost of actually printing the pages. He was using that as an example for the price of drugs in America and the fact that it costs 800 million to a billion dollars and takes 8-10 years to bring a new drug to market. Therefore companies can't just charge twice what it costs to produce the pill and survive.

One explanation he gave that stood out to me was the reason drugs are cheaper in Canada and Mexico, something I have never understood. According to Mr. Lott, apparently there are World Trade Organization rules that force drug companies to come to some sort of price agreement with the government in other countries or the government can take their patent after two years and give it to someone else. In other words, Canada can tell our drug company we'll let you sell this drug for twice what it costs to produce, take it or leave it. If the company refuses, Canada takes the patent and has one of their companies produce it themselves. If that's true, it sure seems like something close to extortion to me...

Continue reading "Book TV: Freedomnomics." »

July 02, 2007

Live Free or Die Hard.

With a title like that, what could be wrong with the movie? ;) I could blame it on the two guys I was with who wanted to see the fourth installment...but I have to admit that I got a kick out of the first two Die Hard's, despite the less than pristine language, so they didn't really have to twist my arm.

The theater was packed yesterday, so much so that we had to sit in the second row...for about two minutes. As it turned out I couldn't see squat at that angle so I decided to sit by myself further up. I found a space between two ladies and proceeded to join them in laughing my way through most of the film.

There are some great one-liners that you're supposed to laugh at, and some fantastically ludicrous action sequences that maybe you're not...but overall it was an entertaining romp. There was language, including McClane's ubiquitous catch-phrase, as well as violence that wasn't quite as gory as I remember from the second one.

I had a couple moments of seriousness while watching, including the sickening realization that the evil dude's plot wasn't completely far-fetched. I won't give it away, but he made ample use of the generation that spawned those who thought it was "cool" when the planes crashed into the WTC. A generation so used to violent movies and video games, so used to retakes and compromises, that they don't always understand the moral consequences of their actions.

If I allow the boys to drag me to Transformers I'll have another review this week. ;)

May 29, 2007

Team of Rivals.

I spent most of yesterday morning finishing up Team of Rivals, a fascinating biography focusing on the political acumen of Abraham Lincoln. I can't recommend this book highly enough, although I realize the 750+ pages might scare some people off. ;) It's exceedingly well written and does a great job of reminding us of our roots, as well as being absolutely pertinent to our current political landscape. 

Continue reading "Team of Rivals." »

May 15, 2007

Same ol' same ol'

As I mentioned a few days ago, I'm reading Doris Kearns Goodwin's biography of Abraham Lincoln: 'Team of Rivals.' It's absolutely fascinating, though at 900 pages it gets tiresome to hold! ;)

One thing I didn't realize about President Lincoln is that he was a poet. I knew he was a fabulous writer, eloquent speaker and a man of towering integrity and strength, but Ms. Goodwin includes a few snippets of poetry in her retelling of his political life and they're not half bad. Like a poem he wrote when returning to his childhood home about the loss of the three most important women in his life <mother, sister, first love>:

I hear the loved survivors tell
How naught from death could save,
Till every sound appears a knell,
And every spot a grave.

Continue reading "Same ol' same ol'" »

January 10, 2007

Nero vs. Peter

A few final thoughts about Quo Vadis, now that I've finished it. First of all, this was a novel not the Bible, so I take it with as much faith as I take most well-researched historical novels I read -- it may have happened this way, but maybe not. In this case, I've done some other reading about Nero and the Roman persecution of the followers of "The Way" and this story seemed pretty accurate.

Continue reading "Nero vs. Peter" »

January 08, 2007

More Thoughts from Quo Vadis.

In the long slog that is Quo Vadis, I've made it 2/3 of the way through. There's only about 200 pages left and I must say, it's been easier since I got used to the "thees, thous and wilt thous." :) I ran across another quote that jumped off the page at me. The main protaganist is trying to decide whether to accept Christianity, but he finds the religion:

"...opposed to the existing state of things, impossible of practice, and mad in a degree beyond all others."

Amen to that!

Continue reading "More Thoughts from Quo Vadis." »

January 06, 2007

Thoughts on Thr3e.

If I'd taken any time to think about it, I probably wouldn't have talked my parents into coming to see Thr3e with me last night. Unfortunately, awhile back I gave them a big lecture about putting their money where their mouth is regarding Christian film -- the outcome being that we saw End of the Spear with 20 of their friends when it was opening against Brokeback Mountain. Thus, when I mentioned going to Thr3e last night on opening night, they were game enough to go along without knowing anything about it.

If you haven't read the book or seen the movie already, don't read on unless you want a wonderfully compelling story ruined for you. Seriously!

Continue reading "Thoughts on Thr3e." »

January 05, 2007

Quo Vadis.

This past week I've been reading Quo Vadis. It was published in 1896 in Polish, so with my college Polish and a Polish-English dictionary I'm slowly making my way through it. <jokes> I'm of course reading the English translation and still it's slow going because of all the latin words that don't translate. I've read other books about the early church in Rome, but this is supposedly a classic so I keep on slugging.

Continue reading "Quo Vadis." »

December 13, 2006

Battle Cry

I stayed up way too late last night finishing the book I've been working on this week -- Battle Cry by Leon Uris. I think I can say that it is one of the best books about World War II I've ever read. Unfortunately, I have to give a warning that the language is pretty atrocious -- but it's not gratuitous, if that makes sense. For some reason, it makes a difference to me if the language is there because, for instance, that's the way Marines in WWII talked to each other, as opposed to f-this and f-that thrown in just to make a novel or movie more edgy.

Continue reading "Battle Cry" »

December 02, 2006

Three

Last week I read Ted Dekker's Three and it was one heck of a thriller. In fact, I stayed up til 4 in the morning finishing it because I just couldn't stand not knowing what was really going on. And contrary to most of the books I've read -- the ending was an actual jaw-dropper that I literally had to re-read to make sure I'd understood correctly. I would highly recommend it. Unfortunately I can't even talk about what was so amazing to me because it kind of gives the plot away, but if any of you decide to read it let me know so we can talk about it. :)

It's quite a bit different from my other faves of Dekker's, the Circle Trilogy (Black, Red and White) which are the best Christian fantasy books I've read since C.S. Lewis. They follow a man in our "reality" who falls asleep and wakes in another "reality" that is in the throes of it's own sin-redemption timeline. Every time he falls asleep in one world he wakes up in the other, and soon events in each start to coincide. In my opinion, the Circle Trilogy books rank right up there with the last Star Wars entry as some of the best metaphors about various aspects of Christianity in current media.

November 27, 2006

Making the Corps

I just finished reading Making the Corps by Thomas E. Ricks. Really interesting book about a group of 63 young men who went into the Marines in 1995. It follows their eleven-week boot camp experience on Parris Island in South Carolina -- why they joined, what their family and friends thought, how they reacted to the culture shock of the Marines and what happened to them after boot camp, if they managed to complete it.

Continue reading "Making the Corps" »

November 02, 2006

Ghost Soldiers.

I just finished reading Ghost Soldiers by Hampton Sides. Really well done, easy to read -- other than the subject matter that is. I'd never read anything about the Bataan Death March and had never heard of the Ranger's rescue. It was disturbing to read of Japanese atrocities, although it wasn't the first time I'd read about them -- I finished Flyboys last year and found it horrifying, for lack of a better word. Definitely worth reading, but horrifying. Flyboys gave a better explanation of where the Japanese warrior mentality came from and made reading Ghost Soldiers a little more understandable, but both are excellent histories.